about FX-Bandit, Steinitz and DoublePlay… “forex expert advisor reviews”
this update is long overdue… the past 2 weeks have been extremely busy.
since finding FX-Bandit, i’ve had the honour of meeting a couple of like-minded traders who were also very interested in what this Expert Advisor could do. it was clear that FX-Bandit had some very good logic built into it. however, after reading the manual and testing it over these 2 weeks, i’ve come to think that where FX-Bandit triumphs, therein also lies it’s weaknesses…
to understand what i mean, one must first understand the “mean reversion” theory. in simple terms, “mean reversion” means buy-and-hold-and-hope-for-the-best. to give it some credit, the “mean reversion” theory, when used with some other form of market analysis, could very well be a profitable strategy. the theory suggests that if one waits long enough, most trades will be able to exit with a profit. there are statistical studies around that justifies this line of thought. however, the MILLION DOLLAR question now is :
- how long should i wait?
- how far should i place my stops to allow this theory to work without risking too much?
at this point, we should now turn our attention to study how FX-Bandit works, as well as how a trader can configure it to make it behave differently…
[updated on 21 nov 2007, 7:30 pm singapore time]
wow! the post is barely half done and it’s already stirring up some interest :o) i had wanted to update sooner… but my girl’s health has been keeping everyone at home rather busy these few days.
ok… back to FX-Bandit. when i first got the demo, i immediately went straight for the manual. to my surprise, for something that’s being sold solely on eBay, i would say that the manual was quite well written. it explained rather clearly some concepts behind the design of the Expert Advisor… although some of them were not in line with my trading psychology.
one particular idea that did not resonate well with me was that the creator advocated that the market is usually volatile enough to close “95% of all trades” at their take-profit level over a course of 3 to 5 days. now.. this leads us to, in my opinion, one of the most controversial parameter in FX-Bandit : Trade_Duration
there was a series of emails between Bill Austin (creator of FX-Bandit) and myself which i initiated to find out how Trade_Duration affects the way the Expert Advisor trades, as well as it’s relation to the various STOP methods that are available in FX-Bandit. this was what i found out…
Trade_Duration is X number of days that FX-Bandit will hang on to a trade before the stops come into effect. in other words, during this X days, the various STOPS are not effective. IN OTHER WORDS, if you set Trade_Duration=4.0, the trades that FX-Bandit opens will NOT have a stop-loss during the first 4.0 days of the trade! sound?…. you decide.
users of this Expert Advisor should take note that FX-Bandit comes with some suggested settings. Trade_Duration in the suggested settings range from 4.0 to 7.0. please note that this can go against you as much as it can help you close a profitable trade. if you put aside the theory about “95% of all trades” will end in profit after X-days, you will realise that the RISK : REWARD ratio is going to lean towards 15 pips : WTF! and no… i’m not refering to The World Taekwondo Federation ;o)
best case scenario = +15 pips. worse case scenario = margin call or whatever the loss is at the end of the X days. if you look at the current FX-Bandit statement which is running with the default setting files, you’ll see that on 12 nov 2007, the USDJPY trade closed with a -384 pips loss, and the EURJPY with -653 pips. they were closed at exactly 4.0 days after the trade was entered.
to give FX-Bandit some credit, the consistency that this Expert Advisor generates winning trades is fantastic. however, the risk / reward aspects need to be studied carefully. good thing about the Expert Advisor is that many of it’s settings are user-configurable. if you are not happy with the 4-day Trade_Duration, you can always make it shorter, or even 0. however, this would mean that you will be using or testing this Expert Advisor with settings that the creator did not recommend. if you are not using the suggested settings from the creator, you are more or less like shooting in the dark… trying to optimise the Expert Advisor by playing around with the parameters yourself.
with the many settings that can be changed, optimising FX-Bandit with different settings will require a systematic approach that may need to cater to, potentially, a huge number of permutations.
with all Expert Advisors (especially the commercial ones), optimisation is the job of the seller/creator. in fact, optimisation should be a continual process where settings need to be adjusted regularly to react to the changing market conditions. it would be ideal if Expert Advisors had the A.I. (artificial intelligence) to adjust or optimise itself automatically… but sadly, this is something that only a rare breed of Expert Advisor coders can do… and if you know of any, please let me know, ok? :O)
so… that’s my take on FX-Bandit. i believe it’s recent performance gives a good indication of it’s strenghts and weaknesses. i would think that one will either love it or hate it. where do i stand? make a guess… :O)
will blog more about Steinitz and DoublePlay in a seperate post…. this one has gone on for too long :O)
ps : appreciate if you could leave a comment if you find this post interesting…. or objectionable :O)
buy ck a coffee :O)


